The new home of Eileen's blog, Imperfect Serenity

Entries in fear (3)

Wednesday
Apr072010

The Spiritual Challenge of Facebook

A big theme in my writing is living with trust because I don’t think it is good for our souls to go through the world with our guard up all the time. I’m not against smoke detectors and seat belts, simple ways we can make ourselves and our loved ones safer. I’m not against security settings on Facebook, either, or other precautions to protect our privacy in the age of the Internet. But I often wonder where to draw the line between precaution and paranoia, especially as a parent. Figuring out whom to friend on Facebook is the latest issue to challenge me to think about what living with trust really means in the cauldron of daily life.

When I first joined Facebook, I friended anyone who asked or whom I recognized on someone else’s friend list. It was fun to reconnect with people I had barely spoken to in high school and those I knew in the Peace Corps. In addition to being a social person enamored with new technology, I had a secret, selfish agenda. Having published a book that went out of print after a few years, I was determined to get better at publicity and networking. Some of my high school friends never heard of that first book when it came out, and I was determined not to make that mistake again. The more friends I had on Facebook, the easier it would be to tell people about my second book when it came out. It was also a little ego boost every time my list of Facebook friends passed another milestone, which I’m sure is quite unQuakerly.

It was not long after the Wisdom book came out when a male friend sent me a message pointing out that there was graphic pornography posted in my “Boxes,” a part of my Facebook account I had never even noticed. Embarrassed, I erased it immediately and then wondered if I had just erased the evidence of who had posted it. There had been one previous inappropriate post that I had erased quickly. My “friends” list suddenly looked like a long line-up of suspects. As I started getting more friend requests from people I didn’t know, I wondered if accepting everyone who asked was really a good idea. A few people had suggested I set up a fan page, anyway. That suddenly seemed smart, especially as my daughter approached her thirteenth birthday, the day when I had promised she could join the Facebook tribe, as long as I was her first friend and she followed certain guidelines. Presumably, that would put her one degree of separation from the porn-poster. 

My daughter has been a responsible, though slightly obsessed Facebook user. She only friends people she actually knows and frequently ignores friend requests from boys in her class on the grounds that they are not really her friends. (No comment from me.) Still, after a terrific class trip to Costa Rica, many of her classmates have started posting pictures of each other, and I don’t think there is any way to put that genie back in the bottle. I remember the book The Science of Fear arguing that parental fears of Internet stalkers are fueled out of all proportion by a sex and fear obsessed media, so I’m trying to take the smoke-detector approach to this, installing basic precautions, but not losing any sleep over worst case scenarios.

On my own account, I decided on a new strategy that I’m still testing. When people I don’t recognize send a friend request, I send a polite message saying that I’m sorry if we’ve met and I’ve forgotten, but I’m only friending people whom I actually know. If they like my work, they can join my fan page, which several have done. Some have explained that they are Quakers, which leaves me wondering if it’s discrimination to “friend” any “Friend,” but not anyone else. Does it matter if they are friends with 32 friends of mine? Or 3? I’m not clear on whether I need a consistent policy or a case-by-case strategy. Most people have been friendly and understanding, but a few have been a little weird about it. One guy a few months ago kind of begged to be my friend, which is a little bit like having someone beg to kiss you—a real turn off, in my experience. You already have over 1,000 friends, I thought. Why are you so desperate to be friends with me?

Today, after sending my standard note to someone whose name I didn't recognize, I got a nice note back from a Quaker from another yearly meeting (which means regional body, in plain English), pointing out that in his area the Internet has been a great way to build community, especially with young adult Quakers, who often feel separate from the older crowd. I agree with this point, and it leaves me wondering what I might be missing by limiting my connections, not in terms of book sales, but in terms of real community.

The thing is that living with trust could mean different things in this situation. It could mean friending anyone who asks, which arguably might be what Jesus would do if he was on Facebook. On the other hand, living with trust might mean doing what feels right to me and trusting that other people can deal with it, or not, as they choose. The most serene people I know are the ones who don’t really care what other people think (which is quite different from not caring about other people). As a woman trained as a people pleaser, I’m trying to cultivate this quality, and it may be that not friending people is giving me good practice, though I don’t feel entirely clear about it. Is my discomfort at rejecting friend requests a sign that this policy is not "rightly ordered," to use the Quaker jargon, or a sign that I need to let go of the desire to have everyone in the world be my friend?

I’m curious how others are defining their boundaries on the Internet and whether or not being a parent affects where those lines get drawn.

Thursday
Feb042010

Life's Fragility

Yesterday, after running into a woman whose husband is in remission from brain cancer, I realized how many reminders I’ve been getting lately of life’s fragility. A member of our meeting has entered hospice after many months of treatment for brain cancer. Another member’s ALS has progressed to the point where, for the first time on Sunday, I couldn’t understand something she said. A good friend, who is my age, just got diagnosed with breast cancer (which is mercifully easier to treat than ALS or brain cancer), and the father of one of my son’s classmates died suddenly of a heart attack on Monday. Another friend’s father-in-law also died this week, all of which prompted me to remember to include our health in the things we thank God for at prayer-time each night.

An awareness of life’s fragility can make us fearful and paranoid (When am I due for a mammogram?), but it can also prompt us to appreciate the present. The meeting member with brain cancer continually posts things on the Internet about trusting God and experiencing peace. The member with ALS made us all get up and dance in our places after worship on Sunday in order to advertise the Brazilian dance party she will be leading from her wheelchair next month. I suspect I’m not the only one who has been moved by these two members’ example.

I finally got through most of The Science of Fear, which I mentioned a few posts ago. It is really a well-written, thought-provoking book. While there were many parts that confirmed things I already believed—(George Bush manipulated people’s fear to lead us into a war that’s not making us safer.)—there were other parts that challenged my beliefs, particularly the author’s assertion that environmentalists manipulate statistics and fear just as much as other groups. He put my fear that my children are being exposed to all kinds of toxic chemicals into the context of childhood mortality rates before we had chlorine in the water, arguing his conclusion that “There’s Never Been a Better Time to Be Alive” in terms of actual risk. Although he may err on the side of underestimating the threat of climate change, he offers a helpful perspective, when so much media is designed to prey on parental insecurity. I found the book just one more reminder that I don’t want to live in fear or encourage the fears of others, despite the real and constant fragility of life. 

So on Saturday, I’m planning to drive my Toyota, full of children, in a snow storm, to take my first snowboarding lesson at age 47. Do I trust God, or what?

 

Wednesday
Jan272010

New Discernment Question

Speaking of fear… I’ve been given my own opportunity to work through some. As some of you know, I teach a class on South African history at University of the Arts, which I really enjoy. The course uses the art, music, and literature of South Africa to study the apartheid era. This is the fifth time I’m teaching it, and the student response has been positive. For some students, the course has been transformative. For me, it has been a way to teach ideas I care about while staying connected to the younger me who was in the Peace Corps in Botswana in the 1980s. I’ve been longing to go back to Southern Africa some time, and though the cost has always seemed prohibitive, teaching this course keeps me feeling somewhat connected.

A few weeks ago, the head of Liberal Arts asked if I would be interested in leading a group of students on a two-week study/trip to South Africa next January. My first reaction was that I’d love to, if I didn’t have kids. He said, “You have a husband don’t you?” It turns out my husband is very supportive, especially since the trip would occur while our kids were in school, so I’ve been seriously thinking about it, swinging from wildly excited about the idea, to just a bit freaked out. Here are a few of the questions that are arising: 

How many college students could I handle as a lone adult in a very different country with a high crime rate?

Could I arrange for another teacher to come with me?

Is it OK to leave my children (ages 10 and 13) for that long?

Knowing that they have a very competent father, why does the thought of going make me feel like a selfish mother?

What if an asteroid hits Three Mile Island while I’m gone, and I can’t reach my family?

What if a UArts student gets hit by a car or arrested for drug use, and I don’t have another teacher to back me up?

What if I’m not as brave as when I was 22 and hitchhiked from Lesotho to Botswana?

And then on the positive side:

Could I arrange a trip that would give the students real engagement with another culture and with inequality, without having us seem like tourists on safari?

Could I arrange a way for the students to share their artistic abilities in schools in South Africa, which might be a particularly meaningful form of service for them?

Could I go in 2011 and then bring my family with me the following year?

I’ve thought about bringing my family to Botswana and then writing a book about the experience, contrasting the country today with the one I lived in pre-AIDS. Although the kids are not enthused, it turns out that the hospice my husband works for has an exchange program in Botswana, which seems so serendipitous that it must be some kind of sign, although it hasn’t yet seemed rightly ordered to pursue that. Perhaps this trip is some kind of preparation for that later, longer excursion?

The biggest question, from a Quaker viewpoint, is, “Am I led to do this?” I’ve wanted to go back to Southern Africa for many years, and here way is opening for me to do so. Does that necessarily mean that this is the way to go? That’s where sorting through my fears gets important. I don’t yet have clarity about whether my fears are signs that I shouldn’t do it or just things to be worked through. As usual, writing is a way for me to process. So is waiting, so I’m going to work on something else this week and see which feelings last.